The Role of Government Regarding Marriage

I can see a need to limit the number of people the government recognizes as being in a marriage for taxation and economic reasons. Beyond that, I think Separation of Church & State limits the state's interest since the concept of marriage originates in religious beliefs. Also, there are various religions which hold many different tenets regarding marriage, some actually opposing, so the state can not further any interest regarding marriage without violating Separation of Church & State and basically imposing one religion's beliefs upon another's.

Living in AZ for over 20 years, I've had several Mormom friends & neighbors. They are good people. There are many denominations and some of them are in plural marriages. While that's not my cup of tea, it works for them. I don't see why they can't legally marry according to their beliefs. The state may wish to limit how many people in the marriage they recognize as being married- but they should be able to marry as many as they wish. Likewise, gay people have churches that do not believe that homosexuality is a sin, & religious leaders who wish to marry them. Yet, the government favors one set of religious beliefs over the other? It has no secular reason to support these laws. No economic rationale to support them.

The government's recognition of marriage should be limited to it's secular & economic interests. It should not favor one religious belief over another. The government's role is to establish an environment in which all different kinds of people, with different religious beliefs, can live freely and peacefully amongst each other, without favoring one religious belief over another.

"The establishment clause has generally been interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference of one religion over another or the support of a religious idea with no identifiable secular purpose." http://www.uslaw.com/us_law_dictionary/e/Establishment+Clause

The government has no secular or economic interests regarding marriage beyond limiting the number of people involved that it recognizes. The only reasons left for these laws are religious.

Yet, we have laws against polygamy and homosexual marriages. So much for "rendering unto Caesar..."

It Boggles the Mind

It boggles the mind:

We can support over 700 military bases in countries we have no business being in, but not health care.

We can send millions and billions of dollars to other countries to help them out, but we resent helping our own.

We can fund a war but not a proper educational system.

We can go from having a surplus to a tremendous deficit in less than 10 years.

Only 5% of the American population control 90% of the countries wealth, but they resent not being able to have it all.

We can export our jobs yet call people lazy for not having one.

We have a number of people who are suppose to be working for the good of the people of the country but are only looking out for corporate interests and their own.

We gave corporations legal status and power as individuals without also giving them legal responsibilities toward the communities and societies within which they operate and toward their employees.

Why is anyone having to go without medical care in the United States in this day and age?

We can fund war and death but not life?

There's something seriously wrong here.